On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com> wrote:
On Apr 17, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
> So maybe "master secret" and "secret" are a bad naming, once it's not
> secret? And the correct would be "API key"
+1 to API key, i believe that is what google might use
+1
variantKey (instead if secret)
AppKey (instead of masterSecret)
Sorry for the bad initial naming :-(
>
> Sebastien Blanc wrote:
>> I compare these secrets with the API keys that Google provides for its
>> services. When you go on their Cloud Console , you can check your API key
>> along with the project number.
>
> --
> abstractj
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile