I'd prefer a) unless you plan to regularly release milestones of b) into Maven
Central. Relying on snapshots in demos and tests is a PITA.

And this looks like
a lot of effort, so branch might be living its own life for a very long time.

Karel

On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 09:58:57 -0400
Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:

> Y'all,
>
> So there has been some concerns with the complexity of the build
> especially where including the Google GCM (push) libraries are
> concerned.  Additionally there have been some requests for a separate
> "push" module which won't need the full aerogear android library.
>
> The full modularization of the library along with several other
> improvements is scheduled for the "2.0" epic.
>
> So my question is a) Should we make a 2.0 which is only the
> modularization sooner and iterate on that a few times before we include
> our improvements in a 3.0 or b) Should we create a "fork" project which
> is only a push module?  This new project will get merged back into the
> main project when we have our complete modularizations.
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev