+1 for 'unifiedpush-node-sender’

tisdag 5 augusti 2014 skrev Daniel Passos <daniel@passos.me>:

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com> wrote:

Do we want to also rename it.

the java sender is called( in maven ),  ‘unifiedpush-java-sender’

while the node one(in npm) is ‘aerogear-sender-client’

i was thinking the name should probably be ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’

I like that

+1 for ‘unifiedpush-sender’ or ‘unifiedpush-sender’

Or unifiedpush-node-sender 

 

what do others think?

On Aug 1, 2014, at 8:48 AM, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com> wrote:

:),  do we a JIRA,  i can whip something up for a guide

On Aug 1, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:

Whenever Luke is ready ? :) 

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:

+1

When?

On 2014-08-01, Sebastien Blanc wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > a few questions:
> >
> > * based on
> >
> > https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client/commit/a5a50e9a87161dfb39f8d3e73f7b1f1d77111e93
> >
> > should we do a new release of the node.js sender ?
> >
> yes
>
> >
> > * going over the docs, do we have 'guide' or so that we can link here:
> >
> > http://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide/next/#_server_integration_tutorials
> >
> not that I'm aware of but we could link (for now) to the README of the
> github which contains instructions.
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Matthias
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev