I like the roadmap JIRA view
+1 to have only JIRA

++
Corinne

> On 02 Feb 2015, at 11:45, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> on our homepage ([1]) we have some handwritten docs that cover the roadmap for parts of our components. These roadmaps contain a duplication of content that is available in JIRA. Since this content is handwritten, it's often not as up-to-date as it should be. Here are a few examples:
>
> * https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGeariOS/
> * https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearAndroid/
> * https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/AeroGearCordova/
>
> Basically the contain incorrect dates and duplicate the list of effected JIRAs. But I wonder why we even do have these handwritten docs?
>
> JIRA itself has a roadmap overview, which looks nice and clean:
>
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGIOS/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGDROID/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGCORDOVA/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
>
> Since we track our issues, versions and releases in JIRA the above roadmaps comes for free. Now, when we change a release date in JIRA, using the above links as our roadmaps means we don't need to update the handwritten doc:-)
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> -Matthias
>
> [1] https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev