On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:26, Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:12:36 +0300
Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich@exadel.com> wrote:
Thank you very much Karel!
We will try both of them.
I've just figured out that Luke is using Mocha -
http://visionmedia.github.io/mocha/. Looks nice as well.
Mocha is nice but I would prefer that we use the same framework across all of JS. I imagine Luke scaffolded the app with Yeoman (could be wrong) and that pulled in mocha. I would prefer we stick with QUnit across the JS bits but feel free to try all 3 suggested as they are all good choices.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Yahor,
QUnit or Jasmine is a pretty good choice. Aerogear uses QUnit from what
I've
seen so far and QE definitely goes QUnit :-)
Karel
[1] https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-extension-qunit
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 13:07:33 +0300
Yahor Radtsevich <yradtsevich@exadel.com> wrote:
Hello all!
I am from the JBoss Tools team, and I am developing CordovaSim - a
simulator for Cordova-based hybrid projects.
Now we are looking for a framework for JavaScript testing. We are
planning
to use it mostly to test various Cordova API methods.
Which framework do you use in the Aerogear development?
How about Jasmine?
I will appreciate any suggestions.
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev