>I'm still worried about having something explicit for the number of records available
It would have to be optional I think as we can't really know if the backend has this support or even wants to support this if there are large amounts of records. Is this your concern?

/Dan


On 17 January 2013 14:45, <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:47:02AM +0100, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
> >I think, it's OK to NOT send that limit/offset overhead to someone
> >that knows about it already. That's what you are saying, right ?
> Yep, so we would just return the 'AG-Total' in this case.
I'm still worried about having something explicit for the number of
records available

-- qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev