If the server interactions are optional I would say "go for it", we can't guarantee that the service will be stable :)

-- 
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

That's been already discussed.

Eventually there may be an option to set the server URI - default
would be todo-app on the rhcloud.

But I am more concerned about the 'update' hassle (on the app-store)

-M

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
I'm not sure about that, because our TODO app depends on the server, right?

The only issue with it is that we can't guarantee TODO as a service.


--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile

On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

Hi,

maybe not really a good idea... but.... do we want to 'release' the
TODO app to the App-Store?

Or is it sufficient enough to keep it as a 'simple' example/guide for
devs that want to use our lib ?

I think I am worried about the 'long' update cycles on the Apple AppStore.

-M

--
Matthias Wessendorf

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list



_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev