On Thursday, October 25, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
returning a "null object", which does nothing would be an interesting approach..That said, I think on iOS (for now) i stay with the current approach returning 'nil' - if a store,pipe,(auth)module could not be found. I guess JS does the same.On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:03 PM, <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:I've added a gist with some pseudo code to describe what I am talking bout.
https://gist.github.com/1efc515a68e3585817f4
On 10/24/2012 02:12 PM, supittma@redhat.com wrote:
> So I try to avoid nulls wherever possible. In the case of the
> Authenticator (and Pipeline) API's we have methods get(String name).
>
> The obvious thing to do would be to return a null object if the name
> isn't a known name.
>
> Would it be better/preferable to return some kind of default
> AuthenticationModule (or Pipe) which does nothing instead?
>
> Alternatively we could supply a peek(name) method which tests for the
> name and throw an exception if you call get with a bad name.
>
> Just some idle thoughts.
>
> Summers
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________aerogear-dev mailing list