>Today at our quickstarts, it doesn't make sense the server[1] without an
>interface[2] (I guess).
It might make sense if a user is only interested in testing the one of the mobile clients but they can just ignore the webapp in that case..

 >I was just wondering if we could merge both in a single project. Or
>maybe make the webapp have the server as dependency, not sure.
I guess we can do that. The only reason I can think of for having them separated was to make the proxy quickstart a little nicer, where we could have the backend, the webapp, and the proxy all on different machines. 

So I think I'm +1 on this :)







On 15 August 2014 10:01, Bruno Oliveira <bruno@abstractj.org> wrote:
Good morning,

Today at our quickstarts, it doesn't make sense the server[1] without an
interface[2] (I guess).

I was just wondering if we could merge both in a single project. Or
maybe make the webapp have the server as dependency, not sure.

Btw the name "client" for the webapp is a little bit odd to me, once it
requires a server.


[1] -
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstarts/tree/master/server/contacts-mobile-picketlink-secured

[2] -
https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-push-quickstarts/tree/master/client/contacts-mobile-webapp

--

abstractj
PGP: 0x84DC9914
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev