here is the current format for comparison+1 to being more structured.one thing though, in the current format, simplePush is not part of the message, but it's own thing
On Feb 9, 2014, at 9:06 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:_______________________________________________On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,I was looking at our current Push Message Format[1] and I was wonderimg if you should not add some more structure to it, decoupling config, criterias and the message itself :
{"config" : {"ttl" : 3600,"content-available" : true,"simple-push": "version=123"},"criteria" : {"categories" : ["someCategory", "otherCategory"],"deviceType" : ["iPad", "AndroidTablet"],"variants" : ["c3f0a94f-48de-4b77-a08e-68114460857e", "444939cd-ae63-4ce1-96a4-de74b77e3737"]},"message": {"alert":"HELLO!","sound":"default","badge":7,"someKey":"some value","anotherCustomKey":"some other value"},}wdyt ?interesting idea - it looks better structured.Regarding "simple-push": "version=123", I'd vote this not to be part of the 'configuration' section, it's the actual message/payload for SPRight ! here the updated gist https://gist.github.com/sebastienblanc/8897596-M
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev