> Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they merged a few changes this week [4].
I'll try to catch up on the spec this week (hard to find the spare time to do this at the moment). 



On 3 June 2016 at 12:51, Idel Pivnitskiy <idel.pivnitskiy@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,

Looks like Web Push WG ready for the WGLC [1]. They gathers feedback as soon as possible.

I've initiated a few thread:
  1. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00549
  2. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00559
Also I want to ask them some questions about not clear parts of the draft for me.

Daniel, could you review the current draft too, please? My suggestion will be to read editor's copy [2], instead of IETF page [3], because they merged a few changes this week [4].

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/threads.html#00524
[2] https://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-protocol/
[3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-05
[4] https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/commits/master

Best regards,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev