On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:

On Feb 25, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Kris Borchers <kris@redhat.com> wrote:

On Feb 24, 2013, at 1:07 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx@qmx.me> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:25:33AM -0600, Kris Borchers wrote:
At the same time, I am leery of leaving it in if iOS and Android don't
have something similar since this feature was not thoroughly
discussed. I would hate to leave this in, only to have to deprecate it
in a later release for something that we decide works better for all
libs.
How do you feel about node.js stability indication on APIs? Perhaps we
could borrow some inspiration there (and this filter API would be
experimental then)

So I like this idea in theory. I have a couple of concerns.
  1. We're talking about a specific method here which is a pretty detailed place to mark something experimental. At the same time, I wouldn't want to mark all of DataManager as experimental just because of one method.

I agree, just that particular method :) 
 
2) Related to #1, we would then have to go through and give a stability rating to every method of every piece of AeroGear and maintain that for every new feature, method, etc.
3) We would need to document our index somewhere similar to http://nodejs.org/api/documentation.html#documentation_stability_index


that would be nice, but having a doc on that particular function/method could be fine, for now…
My concern with doing that is then we haven't standardized a way to mark things as experimental and it could get out of hand quickly and messy to clean up later.


For iOS we are safe (like JS). Christos is working on an NSPredicate-based API/function + tests;

I think... we need to have some more abstract specs (like for pagination) for Store and Pipes;

 -Matthias




--
qmx
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev



--
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf