On 09/18/2013 09:37 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:31:36 -0400
> Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/17/2013 11:17 AM, Karel Piwko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I went once again through
>>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/2013-June/002901.html - which
>>> says that Sender API should be fire&forget. It feels more like "maybe
>>> fire"&forget, for instance it does not say that your credentials were wrong
>>> - or it says, you need parse logs to get that information.
>>>
>>> If I think about Android, iOS, JS solutions to communicate with
>>> UnifiedPush we provide - Pipes - they always provide a callback to be
>>> executed on success/failure. Could we add callback to Sender API? Or should
>>> not Aerogear rather have something like Pipes abstraction for Java
>>> developers instead of pretty dumb Sender API?
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>> In a bit of crazy land perhaps the client could keep a web socket or BSD
>> Socket open to the server which would let it get callbacks about things
>> that happen further down the tree.
> Isn't this land called vert.x?

Maybe I misunderstood.  I thought it was wanting to get information from
the push server about the status of messages being sent not the response
of the commands to the push server itself.

>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Karel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev