On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Mozilla specifies[1] a function called "mozSetMessageHandler" while we named this function "setMessageHandler" in our polyfill [2] . This is the handler for incoming push notifications.

I'm not really a big fan of specific prefixes but again if we want to be really polyfill here, we should align.

hrm, not sure - I think, eventually theirs will be ``setMessageHandler`` as well;

Yes, I should ping them on their list to have more details. 

Why not just setting a reference from ``mozSetMessageHandler `` to ``setMessageHandler`` ? That way both would work, right ?
You mean defining both functions and calling setMessageHandler from  mozSetMessageHandler ?


No, just like:

navigator.setMessageHandler = function(..) {........}; /// what we have ATM
navigator.mozSetMessageHandler = navigator.setMessageHandler; // a reference

Ok right , got it :)
That makes me think that we should have a page on our site describing these kinds of things when develloping for ffos.

"these kind of things" ?
Things to take care of when implementing simple push in your app and want to make sure it works on ffo,  like adding permissions to the manifest, the ref to mozSetMessageHandler , etc ...
Just a simple guide. 

_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev