>we still have the “spec” on aerogear.org that says what to do on the 409?
Good point, the spec pages need updating. At the moment they are is still valid, that for conflict resolution our client libraries require that the server be able to return a 409 and the latest version of the stored document. This is more about removing this particular server. It was just an example for testing.

On 4 December 2014 at 16:15, Lucas Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com> wrote:
lets delete it.

we still have the “spec” on aerogear.org that says what to do on the 409?
> On Dec 3, 2014, at 9:45 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2014 05:46 AM, danielbevenius wrote:
>> I'd like to delete the  restsync
>> <https://github.com/danbev/aerogear-sync-server/tree/differential-synchronization/restsync>
>> module from the differential-synchronization branch.
>> As mentioned previously in this thread, I thought it might be nice to have
>> it around but it is causing more confusion and not really being used.
>>
>> Let me know anyone objects. If not I'd like to delete it tomorrow.
> killitwithfire.gif
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> /Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-aerogear-sync-server-repository-tp9016p10240.html
>> Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> --
> Summers Pittman
>>> Phone:404 941 4698
>>> Java is my crack.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev


_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev