Basically it is something that we "agreed on" (or rather didn't catch) during mockup reviews and that never changed from that time.@Andres: did it have some reason to hide the details?I'm all for exposing it more visibly.st 24. 6. 2015 v 17:21 odesílatel Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> napsal:_______________________________________________Hi,on our old design the PushApplicationID/MasterSecret was very good to notice:Now it's a bit more hidden (one has to click on the "Sender API" tab of the Application).Similar w/ the VariantID/Secret pair, IMO it is also a bit hidden, since this is only visible in the source snippets for the variant.They used to be a bit more present:https://aerogear.org/docs/unifiedpush/ups_userguide//img/applications_variant_details.pngSince I find that suboptimal, I am wondering if that's done for a good reason, or if something (in a future version?) should be changed ?-M--Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev