Ummm, I have to disagree there. The entire idea of SimplePush is based around bringing push notifications to web apps. If a Cordova dev wants push notifications they will more likely use something like https://github.com/phonegap-build/PushPlugin or some other push plugin along with the native (APNS, GCM) services since I imagine they want the push notification to also happen when the app isn't open. Our SimplePushClient won't give them that.On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Burr Sutter <bsutter@redhat.com> wrote:I would like to see a much more explicit identification of PhoneGap/Cordova wrapped around that aerogear.jsOur largest userbase should be the Phonegap/Cordova crowd.
_______________________________________________On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:57 PM, Kris Borchers wrote:_______________________________________________On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:23 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons@redhat.com> wrote:On 12/08/2013 20:39, Kris Borchers wrote:
I also like it. One request/question. Would it be possible and not confusing to split the JS image to also show desktop? I'm thinking split the image on a diagonal from bottom left to top right so that upper left side of image is the top portion of a mobile device and bottom right portion of image is the bottom of a monitor and partial keyboard? I just think it would be cool to show it would work on both somehow in one image.
Yep, that's a good idea. Updated version:
https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push_server.pngNice! Much better than my idea. I like it!
Hylke
On Aug 12, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:
I personally like it
On Monday, August 12, 2013, Hylke Bons wrote:
https://raw.github.com/hbons/aerogear-design/master/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
How's that?
Hylke
On 12/08/2013 14:12, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Luke's UI is already using the latest wording, so I am not sure besides the overview graphic if there are much changes really needed
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Hylke Bons <hbons@redhat.com> wrote:
Sure. Sounds like an improvement to me. I guess we need this updated in the wireframes and implementation as well then?
Hylke
On 08/08/2013 13:43, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi Hylke,
can we get an update on this image:
http://staging.aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-server-push/aerogear_unified_push_server.png
* the "Mobile Variant Instances" are now named "Installations"
* there is no device representing a SimplePush client
I guess I should file a JIRA :-)
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev