On February 5, 2014 at 5:47:24 PM, Matthias Wessendorf (matzew@apache.org) wrote:You’ve probably misunderstood what I said, but that would be silly and impractical, I didn’t say that, right? If you don’t want to require an input every time, make use of SINGLE key to encrypt the passphrases that’s what was suggested.
> > yeah, but that is really per variant, not global. So we would
> need a lot of these secret file :-)
That’s what I’ve already mentioned, the password MUST be provided. And there are a gazillion of solutions to the same problem outside there.
>
>
>
> Perhaps I am wrong, but I feel that if (for iOS variants) we start
> to require "password_to_my_superpassphrase" on the request
> for creating the logical construct of the variant,
> and use the same for the Sender, we would have that magical password,
Why?
> but I fear that this opens a new can of worms.
I don’t bother whoever will solve this ticket. If you want to jump in, feel free to reassign to you, if don’t I can look at this on the next week.
>
>
> The AGPUSH-358 ticket is still yours :-) I just felt looking at
> it, while reading up on our crypto bits.