9:42 p.m.
All (but specifically Dan),
Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty thorough set of tests
from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
11:43 p.m.
Oh, very nice. I'll take a look at this as I go through the spec again this
week.
On 24 July 2013 03:42, Kris Borchers <kris.borchers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
All (but specifically Dan),
Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty
thorough set of tests from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
12:11 a.m.
On Wednesday, July 24, 2013, Kris Borchers wrote:
All (but specifically Dan),
Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty
thorough set of tests from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
nice findings!
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
3:12 a.m.
Looks interesting. But both make and Python make me scary ;-).
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:42:18 -0500
Kris Borchers <kris.borchers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
All (but specifically Dan),
Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty thorough
set of tests from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
3:24 a.m.
My thought is that we should complement our existing tests with what they
have. We don't have to use their tests, but can be good to run them
manually to verify that we are on track with them.
On 24 July 2013 09:12, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Looks interesting. But both make and Python make me scary ;-).
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:42:18 -0500
Kris Borchers <kris.borchers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> All (but specifically Dan),
>
> Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty
thorough
> set of tests from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
>
> https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
3:40 a.m.
Count with my help Dan. Maybe we can coordinate how to trigger those tests?
Daniel Bevenius wrote:
My thought is that we should complement our existing tests with what
they have. We don't have to use their tests, but can be good to run them
manually to verify that we are on track with them.
--
abstractj
3:46 a.m.
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:24:33 +0200
Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My thought is that we should complement our existing tests with what
they
have. We don't have to use their tests, but can be good to run them
manually to verify that we are on track with them.
I'd prefer running tests on regular basis. So either rewriting tests to Java to
match SimplePush code and make them part of it. Or maybe clone their repo and
put .travis.yml that will fetch simplepush server from git and execute tests
against it.
On 24 July 2013 09:12, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Looks interesting. But both make and Python make me scary ;-).
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:42:18 -0500
> Kris Borchers <kris.borchers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All (but specifically Dan),
> >
> > Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty
> thorough
> > set of tests from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
> >
> > https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
4:08 a.m.
So either rewriting tests to Java to match SimplePush code and make
them
part of it.
Yep, This is what I meant.
On 24 July 2013 09:46, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:24:33 +0200
Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> My thought is that we should complement our existing tests with what they
> have. We don't have to use their tests, but can be good to run them
> manually to verify that we are on track with them.
I'd prefer running tests on regular basis. So either rewriting tests to
Java to
match SimplePush code and make them part of it. Or maybe clone their repo
and
put .travis.yml that will fetch simplepush server from git and execute
tests
against it.
>
>
> On 24 July 2013 09:12, Karel Piwko <kpiwko(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Looks interesting. But both make and Python make me scary ;-).
> >
> > On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:42:18 -0500
> > Kris Borchers <kris.borchers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > All (but specifically Dan),
> > >
> > > Thought this might be of interest. It looks like it may be a pretty
> > thorough
> > > set of tests from the Mozilla folks for their Go server.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/jrconlin/simplepush_test
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> >
_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
3928
days inactive
3928
days old
8 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Bruno Oliveira -
Daniel Bevenius -
Karel Piwko -
Kris Borchers -
Matthias Wessendorf