Hi folks, for early Jan, I'd like to get the UPS-1.1.1 out: https://issues.jboss.org/projects/AGPUSH/versions/12327457 Not sure we will be doing a 1.1.2 later, but maybe... given these JIRAs: https://issues.jboss.org/projects/AGPUSH/versions/12323762 The next minor version will be 1.2.0: https://issues.jboss.org/projects/AGPUSH/versions/12327301 However, I had quick chat w/ Lukas in the morning, that we already have KC version update on master, but that really should not be in a 1.1.x patch version. Here is the proposal of what to do: * I branch of master for a 1.1.x patch branch, and on that branch, I simply rewert the KC update. * Obviously on master we keep the update, but also update the version there to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT Also, since "active" branches are a PITA (we had that on 1.0.x), the idea is that the 1.1.x branch will be deleted ASAP, e.g. once we get out 1.1.1 shipped. In case we do a 1.1.2, we'd simple create a new 1.1.x branch of the 1.1.1 TAG. But on master, things will be moving forward, towards UPS 1.2.0 Any thoughts? -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Hi Matthias, the overall plan looks good to me. Just a question to make sure I understood. - on master - Keycloak 1.7.0.Final

Go ahead! On Wed, Dec 16, 2015, 2:12 PM Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno(a)abstractj.org&gt; > wrote: > >> Hi Matthias, the overall plan looks good to me. Just a question to >> make sure I understood. >> >> - on master - Keycloak 1.7.0.Final >> > > yes, and basically upgrading from current 1.5.0 to 1.7.0 - only on master > > - on 1.1.x branch - Keycloak 1.5.0.Final >> > > no - will revert that particular fix on the 1.1.x branch, so that the KC > update is "only" on master > > > >> >> Is that correct? >> >> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew(a)apache.org&gt; >> wrote: >> > Hi folks, >> > >> > for early Jan, I'd like to get the UPS-1.1.1 out: >> > https://issues.jboss.org/projects/AGPUSH/versions/12327457 >> > >> > Not sure we will be doing a 1.1.2 later, but maybe... given these >> JIRAs: >> > https://issues.jboss.org/projects/AGPUSH/versions/12323762 >> > >> > The next minor version will be 1.2.0: >> > https://issues.jboss.org/projects/AGPUSH/versions/12327301 >> > >> > However, I had quick chat w/ Lukas in the morning, that we already >> have KC >> > version update on master, but that really should not be in a 1.1.x >> patch >> > version. >> > >> > Here is the proposal of what to do: >> > * I branch of master for a 1.1.x patch branch, and on that branch, I >> simply >> > rewert the KC update. >> > * Obviously on master we keep the update, but also update the version >> there >> > to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT >> > >> > Also, since "active" branches are a PITA (we had that on 1.0.x), the >> idea is >> > that the 1.1.x branch will be deleted ASAP, e.g. once we get out 1.1.1 >> > shipped. In case we do a 1.1.2, we'd simple create a new 1.1.x branch >> of the >> > 1.1.1 TAG. >> > >> > But on master, things will be moving forward, towards UPS 1.2.0 >> > >> > >> > Any thoughts? >> > >> > >> > -Matthias >> > >> > -- >> > Matthias Wessendorf >> > >> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aerogear-dev mailing list >> > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> - abstractj >> _______________________________________________ >> aerogear-dev mailing list >> aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev