The first idea is great but the scope might require full time commitment. I would vote on #2 depending on which kind of application do you have in mind. -- abstractj On February 17, 2014 at 1:51:46 PM, Matthias Wessendorf (matzew(a)apache.org) wrote: > > Hi, > > wondering about GSoC for 2014. Do we want to be part of it? Reviewing > the > GSoC-2014 list from JBoss, I see a few left-overs from last year > are in > here: > > https://community.jboss.org/wiki/GSOC14Ideas > > * Implement a Mobile Document Collaboration App > * Demo: Implementing native features in mobile applications > > I am not sure if folks are still interested in these ? > > Aside for these 'older' items, there are some ideas (mostly around > push) I > put together in a gist: > https://gist.github.com/matzew/bb9e3a0da6aca939b523 > > Especially #1 on that list is a huge interest of mine. > > > Any thought ? > -Matthias > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > _______________________________________________ > aerogear-dev mailing list > aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

Matthias Wessendorf wrote > * Demo: Implementing native features in mobile applications One option for native features would be to use BridgeIt: I'll do some additional work on this demo, but in this fork of the aerogear-js-cookbook I've added photo thumbnails: https://github.com/bridgeit/aerogear-js-cookbook/tree/master/intro_to_pip... Cheers, Ted. -- View this message in context: http://aerogear-dev.1069024.n5.nabble.com/aerogear-dev-Google-summer-of-c... Sent from the aerogear-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ aerogear-dev mailing list aerogear-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

> Hi Matthias, It has been a while, it's good to talk with you again. ICEsoft is interested in building a first-class integration between AeroGear and BridgeIt -- AeroGear provides storage and security features and BridgeIt provides web-based device features (without the App Store aspect of Cordova). Even the push technologies are complementary and 

could be combined (but that looks like a much larger project, so could be investigated later). I agree, the GSoC project needs to run it's own course -- but those are cool topics, so it would be interesting to also try a BridgeIt integration for any device features that were needed. If those projects didn't go forward before, ICEsoft could start them off as new AeroGear/BridgeIt  demos.

(Mobile collaboration seems fairly important, as of yesterday it's apparently worth $19B.)

Cheers, Ted.