Wei Li This Jira is the best place currently to find that information and flesh out what it should be. Is that OK or do you think we should move discussion to the list?

We can keep the discussion going here, but I think once the final format is agreed, we should have it available as part of the API documentation for the metrics service. If there is one there already, I think it's better to create a PR with the suggested format and then we can have the discussion there.

For the naming of the checks, I think each check will need both an ID field and a name field. The ID field is the unique identifier of the check and it should be used by the backend to aggregate data, we can suggest using the java class name style as the id. The name field can then be used for visualisation, it doesn't have to be unique, but for the checks provided by us, they will be.

For AGDROID-771, I am going to add comment there to explain my thoughts.