Pete:

To me it makes sense to do:

scaffold from-entity --scaffoldType android_aerogear
scaffold from-entity --scaffoldType html5_aerogear
scaffold from-entity --scaffoldType html5_aerogear_cordova
scaffold from-entity --scaffoldType html5_angular
scaffold from-entity --scaffoldType html5_backbone
scaffold from-entity --scaffoldType html5_cordova
scaffold from-entity --scaffoldType ios_aerogear

IOW put the tech first, followed by the impl. This should make it easier for people to pick the one they want.

+1 that makes sense to me. I'd like to see the AeroGear plugins building on and working with the same base plugins. I'm not sure how inheritance or abstractions work with forge, but something to think about.

We should link any related jira's around this in FORGE, or JDF.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira