| from Dara Hayes' email on mobile-dev: Hey folks, there is also an issue right now with websockets in the community cluster. When attempting to start a subcscription via GraphQL Playground, the websocket connection attempt fails, WebSocket connection to 'wss://data-sync-server-datasync-test.community.skunkhenry.com/graphql' failed: Error during WebSocket handshake: Unexpected response code: 400 It seems that the request is reaching the server, I can see one log in the server:
{ |
"level": 30, |
"time": 1534932393268, |
"msg": "request completed", |
"pid": 18, |
"hostname": "data-sync-server-3-tgqm7", |
"req": { |
"id": 7, |
"method": "GET", |
"url": "/graphql", |
"headers": { |
"accept-encoding": "gzip, deflate", |
"accept-language": "en-US,en;q=0.9", |
"cache-control": "no-cache", |
"origin": "http://data-sync-server-http-datasync-test.community.skunkhenry.com", |
"pragma": "no-cache", |
"sec-websocket-extensions": "permessage-deflate; client_max_window_bits", |
"sec-websocket-key": "1LhEQsQCJ+v8xa8PCHUWJw==", |
"sec-websocket-protocol": "graphql-ws", |
"sec-websocket-version": "13", |
"user-agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_13_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36", |
"x-forwarded-for": "148.252.9.234, 10.10.0.12", |
"host": "data-sync-server-http-datasync-test.community.skunkhenry.com", |
"x-forwarded-host": "data-sync-server-http-datasync-test.community.skunkhenry.com", |
"x-forwarded-port": "80", |
"x-forwarded-proto": "http", |
"forwarded": "for=10.10.0.12;host=data-sync-server-http-datasync-test.community.skunkhenry.com;proto=http" |
}, |
"remoteAddress": "::ffff:10.128.0.1", |
"remotePort": 36292 |
}, |
"res": { |
"statusCode": 400, |
"header": "HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request\r\nX-Powered-By: Express\r\nAccess-Control-Allow-Origin: *\r\nDate: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:06:33 GMT\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\nTransfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n\r\n" |
}, |
"responseTime": 1, |
"v": 1 |
}
|
It doesn't work with HTTP or HTTPS. It does work however in a local OpenShift instance using oc cluster up. I believe it might be something to do with the OpenShift Router/Load Balancer. Perhaps there is some global config that is changing the default behaviour. If anyone has any ideas what might cause this, please let me know. |
