| Ali Ok What you have proposed does solve the problem, however, I am not sure it's best we can do. From my POV, developers can implement their own audit logger if they would like to have the audit logs pushed to completely different places rather than printing to the console. But asking developers to implement their own logger when they just want to hide a few fields is bit overkill, especially when the logger we use itself already supports it: http://getpino.io/#/docs/redaction. So I think adding support for it is relative easy for us to do, and also make the life for developers a little bit easier. We should obviously still document how to implement their own audit logger if they want to, but it is a different requirement I think. cc Wojciech Trocki Christopher Foley |