On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Michael,The health endpoint is protected by Keycloak, you can see here the different patterns on how the endpoints are protected https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/servers/ups-wildfly/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xmlI'd not change that.Here also a sample on how you could call this endpoint from a third party app/lib: https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/node.js/directgranttest.jsHere we create a Push Application but you could adapt it easily to ping the health endpoint.the readme contains some hints on the required Keycloak update for thatActually, isnt it lame the UI does not show the info - somewhere ?You mean the REST doc ?
SebiOn Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Fischelmayer Michael <Michael.Fischelmayer@apa.at> wrote:_______________________________________________Hello,
How is the Health Status Enpoint protected?
https://SERVER:PORT/CONTEXT/rest/sys/info/health/
I get an 401 but I can’t find the protection method in the rest docu.
https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/index.html#-2006359689
Thanks and Regards
Michael
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
--Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users