On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org> wrote:I think it would be good for the community to move forward and use latest technology. Node 0.12 is already very old, given the current version is 6.How about getting promisses in, and afterwards release this as a 1.0.0 release ?i think this sounds like a plan,/me goes and creates a JIRAOn Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui@redhat.com> wrote:_______________________________________________-Lukeanyway, would like to hear some thoughts.i suppose those users would need to stick to the previous versions then.My only concern is other projects that might be using the sender that are not yet on node 0.12 or above, since this is when promises became native. I would really like to not have to include the polyfill.Perhaps once we fully move to promises, then we can hit a 1.0.0If this is to big of a change all at once, we could always do both callbacks and Promises. I think we did this for Datamanager in the past.considering we have not yet hit a 1.0.0, we can pretty much just make this change and we will be ok.When i first created this 3 years ago, that was sort of the standard way of doing things, but Promises have become very popular(i know i love them :)) and have been a native feature since node 0.12.xCurrently it uses callback pattern that many node.js packages use as well as emitting events.Hello people,I think i would like to move the unifiedpush-node-sender, https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-nodejs-client , to be Promise based.
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
--Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
_______________________________________________
Aerogear-users mailing list
Aerogear-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users