Am 19.10.2016 um 14:25 schrieb Gunnar Morling <gunnar@hibernate.org>:Hi Hendrik,Thanks, having such test bed will be very useful!Adding some association to the model (a plain reference or a collection annotated with @Valid) would be a great addition so we can use it to explore cascaded validation, too.One question: this does not address the actual issue of BVAL-214 - which is the validation of class-level constraints in the course of validateValues() - yet, right? I.e. in its current form, this is essentially taking the existing validateValue() and exposes it in a form more easily digestable for the purposes of UI validation, right?--Gunnar_______________________________________________2016-10-12 8:45 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Ebbers <hendrik.ebbers@me.com>:Hi all,
I created a small JavaFX as a playground for proposal BVAL-214. I already added a dummy implementation for my idea (see http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-214/# ).proposition-2 You can find the sources here: https://github.com/guigarage/BeanValidationForUI I added a dummy implementation for the validation API and the sample can simply be started by the com.guigarage.validation.Demo class I will add some doc later to describe my ideas.Cheers,
Hendrik
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/ beanvalidation-dev
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev