+1 for naming consistency

Best regards,

Seb

On 04.01.2013 11:05, Gunnar Morling wrote:

Hi all,

While working on the TCK, I came across our new method Validator#forMethods() which allows to validate method and constructor parameters/return values.

Given that we introduced the term "executable" when referring to both methods and constructors, I wondered whether the method should better be named "forExecutables()".

Thoughts?

--Gunnar

_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev