No objections :) Thanks Gunnar!Regards,MarcoOn Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Michael Nascimento <misterm@gmail.com> wrote:LGTM.Regards,MichaelOn Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar@hibernate.org> wrote:______________________________Hi,There is a proposal for using the new reflective parameter names for executable validation: http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-498/ It's there for a while and I've moved forward by creating a PR with the spec change: https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation-spe c/pull/114 Can you please let me know about any remarks by the end of the week. Silence will be taken as "no objections". Not that I expect much controversy on this one :)Thanks,--Gunnar_________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/ beanvalidation-dev