I will let Hardy and Gunnar answer that one, this has been discussed a lot and some arguments they provided lead to delegate the rules implementations to the integration framework.
> _______________________________________________
On 25 juil. 2013, at 22:55, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi @ all,
>
> currently every framework which needs to integrate (bv based) method-validation has to implement the rules specified for @ValidateOnExecution itself.
> there is no method in the api for delegating the evaluation to the bv-implementation (and everything passed to ExecutableValidator gets validated
> independent of the xml based or annotation based config).
>
> it isn't just a higher effort for such frameworks, it (already) leads to inconsistencies across frameworks.
> -> imo it should be one of the first topics for bv.next.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev