I'm not convinced the proposed new names are particularly clear at first glance, although I'd concede they're a more accurate description.

I'd probably favour the current naming convention.

Rich.

On May 31, 2012 6:16 AM, "Michael Nascimento" <misterm@gmail.com> wrote:

It is not a widely used part of the API and the suggested names make
more sense, so I vote for using new consistent names and deprecate the
old ones.

Regards,
Michael

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel@hibernate.org> wrote:
> Can you guys weight in on this issue https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-289
>
> Emmanuel
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev