Hi,that’s fine :) I didn’t know that a CI is already setup.Am 19.08.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Gunnar Morling <gunnar@hibernate.org>:Hi,Thanks for making this proposal!As Guillaume is saying, we have CI jobs for all the BV/HV artifacts on CloudBees already (some other related things such as the website build are on the main Hibernate CI server).So I don't think we'll gain very much by adding the Travis configuration. But if would actually be helpful to you, e.g. in order to more easily have CI for your own forks, then I don't mind having the config added. Glad to accept a PR if you feel like giving it a shot.Cheers,--Gunnar______________________________2016-08-19 14:23 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>:Gunnar, thoughts?Not sure it's worth it for every repository but it might be worth the work for some.I did the work to add a .travis.yml for Validator a while ago so that we can have CI for our own forks.Hi Hendrik,At the moment, the official CI for BV and Hibernate Validator is on Cloudbees: https://hibernate-validator.ci.cloudbees.com/ .On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Hendrik Ebbers <hendrik.ebbers@me.com> wrote:Hi,
should we use Travis (https://travis-ci.org) for CI of all the repos? I can provide a PR that contains the configuration.
Cheers,
Hendrik
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/ beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/ beanvalidation-dev