Hi Antonio,

It's an ongoing debate whether it's good to put repo information into POMs or not, see e.g. [1]. The major problem is that users of such a pom.xml as dependency will get that repo pulled into their own build, which might not be what they want. 

Now I guess there won't be many people using the TCK as dependency, but I still think it's saver to leave the repo info out of the POM and have users add it to their settings.xml. With the BV reference implementation we provide an examplary settings.xml which can be used for building: mvn clean install -s settings-example.xml. I've created a ticket for the TCK to do the same [2].

Thanks again for your feedback,

--Gunnar

[1] http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-poms-is-a-bad-idea/
[2] https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVTCK-30


2012/12/23 Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing@gmail.com>
Thanks, just by adding the following repository in the pom.xml works. You might want to add it to the pom as not everybody declares JBoss Repo in their settings.xml

  <repositories>
    <repository>
      <id>jboss-public-repository</id>
      <name>JBoss Public Repository</name>
    </repository>
  </repositories>


Thanks again 





--
Antonio Goncalves 
Software architect and Java Champion

Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France

_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev