+1 for #3

regards,
gerhard



2012/2/28 Michael Nascimento <misterm@gmail.com>
3 seems by far the best since it can be strongly typed-checked through
a processor, as mentioned.

Regards,
Michael

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel@hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> On 26 févr. 2012, at 12:21, Gunnar Morling wrote:
>
>> @Emmanuel: For the first BV 1.1 draft I suggest to leave out
>> cross-parameter constraints. This shouldn't change the general scheme
>> of method validation, so we could add that in a later draft revision.
>
> That or you describe succinctly options 2 and 3 for feedback.
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev

_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev