Hi Hendrik,
Thanks, having such test bed will be very useful!
Adding some association to the model (a plain reference or a collection annotated with @Valid) would be a great addition so we can use it to explore cascaded validation, too.
One question: this does not address the actual issue of BVAL-214 - which is the validation of class-level constraints in the course of validateValues() - yet, right? I.e. in its current form, this is essentially taking the existing validateValue() and exposes it in a form more easily digestable for the purposes of UI validation, right?
--Gunnar