Experts,
another issue where we need some feedback is BVAL-368,
which is about the name of path nodes representing return
values.
As per the current draft, Node#getName() returns null in
that case. Question is, whether we should return something
more meaningful, and if so, which value.
The RI used to return "$retval" before we change this to
match the spec. Another obvious option would be "returnValue".
Having a standardized node name for return value nodes would
also help with better toString() implementations for j.v.Path
(although that's not standardized).
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
--Gunnar