I'm not convinced the proposed new names are particularly clear at first glance, although I'd concede they're a more accurate description.
I'd probably favour the current naming convention.
Rich.
It is not a widely used part of the API and the suggested names make
more sense, so I vote for using new consistent names and deprecate the
old ones.
Regards,
Michael
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel@hibernate.org> wrote:
> Can you guys weight in on this issue https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-289
>
> Emmanuel
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev