Hi all, many thanks to those who already provided me with feedback on the method validation proposal. Everyone else I'd like to invite to have a closer look at the proposal and share your thoughts. As I mentioned, there are several sections needing further consideration or a decision to be made; I'll start dedicated threads regarding these items on the mailing list within the next days. Thanks again for your efforts, --Gunnar 2012/1/29 Gunnar Morling<gunnar.morling(a)googlemail.com>: > Hi all, > > I've pushed now a first version of the proposal for method validation > (BV-241) to beanvalidation.org [1]. > > The proposal is still missing some parts (e.g. the XML configuration), > but I hope it touches all major issues related to method validation. > Throughout the document I've used the "DISCUSSION" marker for sections > which still need further consideration or a decision between several > possible options. > > I'd be very happy on any feedback related to these issues in > particular but of course also to the complete proposal in general. > Don't hesitate to speak up in case you think anything is incomplete, > is missing or something doesn't make sense to you; after all this is > very much work in progress. Feel free to add remarks in place within > the document or start a dedicated discussion on the mailing list. > > --Gunnar > > [1] http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-241/ _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev