Hello Antoine,

does it make sense to have close() and shutdown() in CDISE? Isn't close() enough?

in findContainerBuilder: iterator shouldn't be called twice I think

About naming: CDISE looks too much an anagram so maybe StandaloneCDI (I'd prefer "Standalone" to "SE") or even UserManagedCDI

About packaging: ".standalone" is good enough IMO

2016-06-20 10:47 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>:

Hi guys,

I posted modification on PR 290 [1] according to last meeting.

I still have 2 points that stays open for me (you may have more) :

- Place and name of the package: should we decide to package SE support in a specific jar, it will be probably better to have a better package name at a higher level

- Name for CDISE class. Perhaps using Container or SeContainer would be better. WDYT ?

Antoine

[1] https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/290

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.