Basically the spec text change to support this is "repeating annotations work as qualifiers.  they continue to act as inclusive, meaning those repeated annotations follow the same resolution strategy as any other qualifiers."


Do you agree?



From: cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org <cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org> on behalf of Antonin Stefanutti <antonin@stefanutti.fr>
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 1:03 PM
To: cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
Subject: [cdi-dev] Repeating annotations support (CDI-460 and CDI-471)
 
Hi,

While CDI-471 (Support repeating qualifiers in typesafe resolution mechanism) targets CDI 2.0, related issue CDI-460 (Support repeating annotations in CDI SPI) doesn’t have any fix version defined. Can it be implied that CDI-460 will be addressed with CDI-471 or is it intentional left undefined? IMHO, it’d be important to have CDI-460 delivered as part of CDI 2.0 as well to bring a consistent support for repeating annotations in CDI.

Thanks,
Antonin


_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
lists.jboss.org
List to discuss the development of CDI (the specification) To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the cdi-dev Archives.



Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
www.apache.org
Apache License Version 2.0, January 2004 http://www.apache.org/licenses/ TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USE, REPRODUCTION, AND DISTRIBUTION. 1. Definitions.

NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.