+1 As the 25th is a Fri.

I am not as far from Paris as at least John (and using CDI a lot here right now;-) so depending on when it'll start on the 25th I hope to make it as early as possible on Fri and all of Sat.

Werner


On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:39 AM, <cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org> wrote:
Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
        cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        cdi-dev-request@lists.jboss.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
        cdi-dev-owner@lists.jboss.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types    discrepancies
      (Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA))
   2. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types    discrepancies
      (Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA))
   3. [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types    discrepancies
      (Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA))
   4. EDR1 ready to be released (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
   5. Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
   6. Re: Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting (Antonio Goncalves)
   7. Re: EDR1 ready to be released (Jozef Hartinger)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)" <issues@jboss.org>
Subject: [cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types
        discrepancies
To: cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
        <JIRA.12576163.1435157807000.79934.1435157821986@Atlassian.JIRA>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-538:
-------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 2.0-EDR1


> Fix parameterized types discrepancies
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-538
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Portable Extensions
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
>            Reporter: Antoine Sabot-Durand
>             Fix For: 2.0-EDR1
>
>
> In the SPI, the spec states the following:
> {quote}
> * For a producer method with method return type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}.
> * For a producer field with field type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}.
> {quote}
> But the Javadoc and impl behavior is
> {quote}
> * For a producer method with method return type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}.
> * For a producer field with field type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)" <issues@jboss.org>
Subject: [cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types
        discrepancies
To: cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
        <JIRA.12576163.1435157807000.79933.1435157821962@Atlassian.JIRA>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Antoine Sabot-Durand created CDI-538:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: Fix parameterized types discrepancies
                 Key: CDI-538
                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538
             Project: CDI Specification Issues
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Portable Extensions
    Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
            Reporter: Antoine Sabot-Durand


In the SPI, the spec states the following:

{quote}
* For a producer method with method return type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}.
* For a producer field with field type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}.
{quote}

But the Javadoc and impl behavior is

{quote}
* For a producer method with method return type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}.
* For a producer field with field type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}.
{quote}





--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 10:58:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand (JIRA)" <issues@jboss.org>
Subject: [cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-538) Fix parameterized types
        discrepancies
To: cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
        <JIRA.12576163.1435157807000.79936.1435157882400@Atlassian.JIRA>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8


     [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Antoine Sabot-Durand updated CDI-538:
-------------------------------------
    Reporter: Antonin Stefanutti  (was: Antoine Sabot-Durand)


> Fix parameterized types discrepancies
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-538
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-538
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Portable Extensions
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.Final
>            Reporter: Antonin Stefanutti
>             Fix For: 2.0-EDR1
>
>
> In the SPI, the spec states the following:
> {quote}
> * For a producer method with method return type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}.
> * For a producer field with field type {{X}} of a bean with bean class {{T}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}.
> {quote}
> But the Javadoc and impl behavior is
> {quote}
> * For a producer method with method return type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerMethod<T, X>}}.
> * For a producer field with field type {{T}} of a bean with bean class {{X}}, the container must raise an event of type {{ProcessProducerField<T, X>}}.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:19:40 +0200
From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>
Subject: [cdi-dev] EDR1 ready to be released
To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <0E18098B-212C-4183-9772-560430AFA89E@sabot-durand.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi guys,

The branch 2.0-EDR1 is ready for release.

Beyond the source, you can check javadoc here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html>

And spec here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html>

Or PDF version:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf>

I have still some work on introduction (major changes, etc?) and on copyright in source files and intend to start release process (three the JCP) tomorrow.

Antoine
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/63b8ab91/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/63b8ab91/attachment-0001.bin

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:16:43 +0200
From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>
Subject: [cdi-dev] Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting
To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <4C409AF7-57D7-4B62-A82F-B40EC9C778BC@sabot-durand.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all,

So the vote closed on modally. We should have talk about the final date in the last meeting, but there was too much on our plate ;).

We have a tie between 18th and 25th, but as John can make it for the 25th and he?s probably the farthest one from Paris to come I propose to keep this date.

Regards,

Antoine


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/bf53ea6c/attachment-0001.bin

------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:27:16 +0200
From: Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] Let's Sept 25th -26th for our F2F meeting
To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>
Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
        <CA+ZZq9-ck=yyQfethzEzBb3SY-wWBXFxT-RvG_2nFsnqcEmXfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

+1

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
antoine@sabot-durand.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> So the vote closed on modally. We should have talk about the final date in
> the last meeting, but there was too much on our plate ;).
>
> We have a tie between 18th and 25th, but as John can make it for the 25th
> and he?s probably the farthest one from Paris to come I propose to keep
> this date.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antoine
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>



--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author

Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter
<http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> |
Pluralsight
<http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> | Paris
JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150625/fc81250c/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:38:36 +0200
From: Jozef Hartinger <jharting@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] EDR1 ready to be released
To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>,    cdi-dev
        <cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <5591121C.2090905@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"

How do we deal with the lack of parameter-level @Priority in the meantime?

On 06/25/2015 11:19 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> The branch 2.0-EDR1 is ready for release.
>
> Beyond the source, you can check javadoc here:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html
>
> And spec here:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html
>
> Or PDF version:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf
>
> I have still some work on introduction (major changes, etc?) and on
> copyright in source files and intend to start release process (three
> the JCP) tomorrow.
>
> Antoine
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20150629/354fedf6/attachment.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).  For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 55, Issue 37
***************************************