Hi Jozef,

I thought you didn't like to have temp stuff in the spec, so fr me it was obvious that we should use the weld experimental package.
Any thoughts?

Antoine
Le lun. 29 juin 2015 à 11:38, Jozef Hartinger <jharting@redhat.com> a écrit :
How do we deal with the lack of parameter-level @Priority in the meantime?


On 06/25/2015 11:19 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
Hi guys,

The branch 2.0-EDR1 is ready for release.

Beyond the source, you can check javadoc here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html

And spec here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html

Or PDF version:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf

I have still some work on introduction (major changes, etc…) and on copyright in source files and intend to start release process (three the JCP) tomorrow.

Antoine


_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.