All,
Thanks for those who voted.
2 votes for ManageableContext
1 vote for ManagedContext
1 vote for UserManagedContext
Therefore I'm declaring the winner ManageableContext.
John
We are trying to find a better name than
UnManagedContext.
ManagedContext is surely opposite to
the option UnManagedContext:o.
ManagableContext fits well with AlternableContext.
In addition, ManagableContext should be managed by others, which is the
same as UserManagedContext and it is shorter.
Hence, +1 for ManagableContext.
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
From:
Antoine Sabot-Durand
<antoine@sabot-durand.net>
To:
Matej Novotny <manovotn@redhat.com>,
"John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@gmail.com>,
Cc:
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
Date:
11/07/2016 15:12
Subject:
Re: [cdi-dev]
[VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts
Sent by:
cdi-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
+1 for UserManagedContext, it says clearly that user is
in charge of managing the context.
ManageableContext is ok as fallback to me but the fact
the the context is manageable does not says anything about who has the
responsibility to manage it.
Le lun. 11 juil. 2016 à 11:02, Matej Novotny
<manovotn@redhat.com>
a écrit :
+1 for ManageableContext
Personally I would still have UnmanagedContext, but since that seems ambiguous
(as does ManagedContext),
I chose ManageableContext.
Matej
----- Original Message -----
> From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
> To: cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 2:50:23 AM
> Subject: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] Name the class that can start/stop contexts
>
> All,
>
> It seems like one of the remaining issues with CDI-30 is the name
for the
> class for the context management. This name isn't permanent, we can
change
> after EDR2, but not after final.
>
> Here's the proposed renames for "UnmanagedContext":
>
> - ManagedContext
> - ManageableContext
> - ProgrammaticContext
> - ExternallyManagedContext
> - UserManagedContext
>
> Please respond back with your vote, I'll leave this open for 3 days
( I
> believe its Monday morning in central Europe), so I'll close it Thursday
> morning.
>
> Reference:
> http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2016/cdi-dev.2016-07-07-16.03.log.html
>
> - John
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the code
> under the Apache License, Version 2
> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).
For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
> property rights inherent in such information.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information._______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU