Is CDI really the right place for this Annotation?

It sounds like this has behavior specific to JTA, which leads me to think that it should be added in the JTA spec, not the CDI spec. What needs to change in the core CDI behavior to make this possible, if anything? If this can be achieved with existing SPIs, then I don't see why CDI would need to change at all to support this.

~Lincoln

From: "Reza Rahman" <reza_rahman@lycos.com>
To: cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:28:13 PM
Subject: [cdi-dev] Transaction Scope for CDI

CDI enthusiasts,

Pete, I and Nigel (JMS 2 spec lead) have been discussing the issue of the transaction scope behind the scenes the past few weeks. Attached is what we came up with and feel it meets the various related use-cases the most effectively. The downside is that it is quite involved (conceptually) and might take a bit of patience to absorb. Please give it a read and let me know your thoughts.

Cheers,

Reza

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev