think javax.cdi.experimental.Priority would be a compromise (using cdi and not enterprise is surely better since it is not aligned on other packages and clearly states where it comes from for experimental stuff)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber

2015-06-29 10:05 GMT-07:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:
Please correct me if I got this wrong, you like to have a org.boss.weld package in the EDR wording?

In that case a strict -1 for any org.jboss.weld package in the official spec EDR!
That’s a total no-go and is legally not possible as you would force ALL implementors to break trademark laws.
This would also probably (in extremis) diminish the Weld trademark… So this is something I guess JBoss would like to prevent as well…

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 29.06.2015 um 12:44 schrieb Jozef Hartinger <jharting@redhat.com>:
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
> I dislike inventing temporary behavior. For @Priority there seems to be consensus about the observer ordering behavior already. We just need a way to enable it until the annotations spec is updated. Weld experimental package will work fine.
>
> Jozef
>
> On 06/29/2015 12:19 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
>> Hi Jozef,
>>
>> I thought you didn't like to have temp stuff in the spec, so fr me it was obvious that we should use the weld experimental package.
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Antoine
>> Le lun. 29 juin 2015 à 11:38, Jozef Hartinger <jharting@redhat.com> a écrit :
>> How do we deal with the lack of parameter-level @Priority in the meantime?
>>
>>
>> On 06/25/2015 11:19 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> The branch 2.0-EDR1 is ready for release.
>>>
>>> Beyond the source, you can check javadoc here:
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/EDR1-Doc/index.html
>>>
>>> And spec here:
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-spec.html
>>>
>>> Or PDF version:
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2898173/cdi-2.0-EDR1.pdf
>>>
>>> I have still some work on introduction (major changes, etc…) and on copyright in source files and intend to start release process (three the JCP) tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>>
>>> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.


_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.