This is not so logical. Because, main reason of using the ProcessSessionBean event is to observe "Session Bean Class" registration, not the observe for the local interfaces.

Moreover, other methods in the interface hierarchy of "ProcessSessionBean" gets <X> into the account, for example

  AnnotatedType<X> getAnnotatedBeanClass()
          Returns the AnnotatedType representing the bean class.

Therefore, it is more convenient to change "ProcessManagedBean getBean"  method  decleration as

public <T> Bean<T> getBean(); where T is the local/local view interface of the session bean.

--Gurkan
From: Pete Muir <pmuir@redhat.com>
To: Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdogdu@yahoo.com>
Cc: cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org; marina.vatkina@sun.com; david.blevins@gmail.com; cdewolf@redhat.com; jpai@redhat.com
Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 12:56:01 AM
Subject: Re: Yan:: Re: [cdi-dev] About ProcessSessionBean<X> Container Lifecycle Event Class

I talked to Carlo on IRC and we worked out the issue:

ProcessBean<X> offers a method getBean() which returns Bean<X>. Bean<X> has a method of type create() which returns an X. If we were to have ProcessSessionBean<X> extend ProcessManagedBean<X> then this would imply that you can create something of type, which in the case of a session bean is the bean class (which can't be created for EJBs with local or remote business interfaces). So ProcessSessionBean is correct as is.

Carlo suggested we might want a "ProcessView" event for EJBs which fired for each EJB view that was registered.

On 13 Jun 2011, at 19:30, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:

> Pete i think that this is not related with the local interfaces. ProcessSessionBean event is fired for every X where X is a session bean class
>
> Pzt, 13 Haz 2011 14:23 EEST tarihinde Pete Muir şöyle yazdı:
>
>> I'm not actually sure, as X always refers to the bean class, rather than anything to do with the local interfaces. Any EJB expert (cc'ing Marina, David, Carlo, Jaikiran :-) able to shed light?
>>
>> On 13 Jun 2011, at 11:46, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In the 1.0 specification, Chapter 11.5.8, ProcessSessionBean<X> container event class was defined as
>>>
>>> public interface ProcessSessionBean<X> extends ProcessManagedBean<Object> {
>>>  public String getEjbName();
>>>  public SessionBeanType getSessionBeanType();
>>> }
>>>
>>> As I commented in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDITCK-215, it  is more accurate to define this interface as
>>>
>>> public interface ProcessSessionBean<X> extends ProcessManagedBean<X>{
>>> ....
>>> }
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> --Gurkan Erdogdu
>>> Founder and PMC Chair, Apache OpenWebBeans
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cdi-dev mailing list
>>> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>>
>