I believe at one point I sent out a proposal. I can dig through my notes. It was shot full of holes and then I thought it was decided that we were not going to proceed on this. To be honest, I don't recall the details, but I can look it up.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:03 PM, George Gastaldi (JIRA) <jira-events@lists.jboss.org> wrote:

   [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12666571#comment-12666571 ]

George Gastaldi commented on CDI-121:

+1 to previous comment.

> TransactionScope
> ----------------
>                 Key: CDI-121
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-121
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Contexts
>         Environment: Java EE
>            Reporter: Richard Hightower
>            Assignee: Richard Hightower
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed)
>   Original Estimate: 3 days
>  Remaining Estimate: 3 days
> Add TransctionalScope as a standard scope to define beans whose lifecycle is the same as a given transaction.
> This scope should start automatically when a transaction starts (but lazily when actually needed).

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

cdi-dev mailing list

Rick Hightower
(415) 968-9037