The vote is not choosing between command line or param map (sorry for the confusion and both could be useful) but on the general adoption of implicit param support.
After EDR1 we’ll still have a more general ticket to deal with bean discovery mode in Java SE to resolve : https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-529


Le 3 juin 2015 à 16:26, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com> a écrit :

I'd be +1 for the param

thats said why not allowing to pass names/regex? javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=myapp-* a bit like EJB modules but with matching pattern(s)


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber

2015-06-03 16:14 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net>:
Hi all,


Yesterday during the meeting we had a discussion about implicit bean archive support under Java SE.
The idea is to have it disabled by default and provide a way to activate it thru parameter "javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=true”on command line or in the parameter map of the initialize method.
Details of the discussion and points of people pro and against this support can be found in meeting log :

http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2015/cdi-dev.2015-06-02-16.01.log.html

I’d like to call for a vote regarding the support of implicit bean archive under Java SE.

This vote will be open for 72 hrs. Answer +1 (yes), 0 (don’t care), -1 (no) to this mail to vote.

Thanks

Antoine

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.