"In the 12.4.2, it states: If the filter is active,
and: .... then we say that the type is excluded from discovery." 
Dne 6.8.2015 v 15:55 Emily Jiang napsal(a):

> In the section 3.6. Java EE components of CDI 1.2 specification, it
has

> the following statement:

>

> /It is safe to annotate Java EE components with //@Vetoed //to prevent

> them being considered beans./

>

> According to my understanding, the JavaEE component classes with @Vetoed

> should still support injections and *ProcessInjectionTarget*events

> should still be fired.

>

> In the 12.4.2, it states:

> /If the filter is active, and: .... then we say that the type is

> excluded from discovery./

>

> Does this mean if a JavaEE component class is excluded from the scan
in

> the beans.xml, its CDI involvement should be ignored (@Inject would
be

> ignored etc)?

I don't think so. I believe the intent of "3.6. Java EE components"
is 

to clarify that if a component class (e.g. a servlet class) is also 

recognized as a managed bean [1] there will be two different 

"components" in your applicaion, each managed by a different
Java EE 

technology - e.g. a servlet managed by the servlet container and a CDI

bean with servlet class in its set of bean types.

The servlet has a different lifecycle, it's managed by a servlet 

container and as such must support injection (but cannot be injected, etc.).

This might be confusing and therefore it's a good idea to veto the Java

EE component classes -> there will be no CDI bean definitions based
on 

the component classes.

[1]

http://docs.jboss.org/cdi/spec/1.2/cdi-spec.html#what_classes_are_beans

>

> Many thanks,

> Emily

> ===========================

> Emily Jiang

> WebSphere Application Server Liberty Profile development, CDI

> Development Lead

>

> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN

> Phone:  +44 (0)1962 816278  Internal: 246278

>

> Email: emijiang@uk.ibm.com

> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB

>

> Unless stated otherwise above:

> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number

> 741598.

> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> cdi-dev mailing list

> cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org

> 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

>

> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses
the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

>

-- 

Martin Kouba

Software Engineer

Red Hat, Czech Republic

_______________________________________________

cdi-dev mailing list

cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
).
For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent
and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.